<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Drugs &amp; Medicaments</title>
        <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Further Evidence of CV Harm With Rosiglitazone</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/gsk_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="GSK" title="GSK" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="133" height="100" align="right" />More evidence supporting the idea that <strong>rosiglitazone</strong> (Avandia, GlaxoSmithKline) does increase the risk of cardiovascular events has come from a new population-based study <font color="blue">[1]</font>.<p>The retrospective case-control study, published in the December 12, 2007 issue of the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em>, was conducted in older patients with diabetes and showed that thiazolidinedione (TZD) treatment, primarily with rosiglitazone, was associated with an increased risk of congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality when compared with other combination oral hypoglycemic agent treatments.</p><p>The study has reignited the arguments surrounding the safety of rosiglitazone, with <strong>Dr Steven Nissen</strong> (Cleveland Clinic) issuing new calls for more forceful action on the drug from the <strong>Food and Drug Administration (FDA)</strong>, while GlaxoSmithKline highlights limitations of the new study and continues to defend the cardiovascular profile of its product.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/12/further-evidence-of-cv-harm-wi.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/12/further-evidence-of-cv-harm-wi.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gsk</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">rosiglitazone</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">side-effects</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">TZD</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Desmopressin Nasal Spray No Longer Indicated for Bed-Wetting</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/fda_logo2.jpg" border="0" hspace="2" vspace="1" width="100" height="100" align="left" />Desmopressin acetate intranasal formulations are no longer indicated for the treatment of primary nocturnal enuresis (PNE) because of the risk for severe hyponatremia that can lead to seizures and death, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned healthcare professionals yesterday.   <p>These formulations are currently marketed as <em>DDAVP</em> (sanofi-aventis US, LLC), <em>Minirin</em> (Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc), and <em>Stimate</em> (CSL Behring, LLC).</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/12/desmopressin-nasal-spray-no-lo.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/12/desmopressin-nasal-spray-no-lo.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">desmopressin</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">fda</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risks</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">side-effects</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>GlaxoSmithKline reportedly threatened diabetes expert over Avandia warnings</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/gsk_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="GSK" title="GSK" hspace="2" vspace="1" width="133" height="100" align="right" />by David Gutierrez <br /><br /> (NewsTarget) A diabetes expert has claimed that pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline threatened him with legal action after he raised concerns about the safety of the company&#39;s anti-diabetes drug rosiglitazone, marketed as Avandia.<br /><br />In a written testimony to a congressional subcommittee, John Buse of the University of North Carolina said that he received phone calls from company executives in 1999, just after Avandia&#39;s release, warning him that his comments about the drug &quot;were scurrilous enough to attempt to hold me liable for a loss in market capitalization.&quot; Buse later signed a statement, drafted by GlaxoSmithKline, attempting to alleviate the concerns that his comments had raised with stockholders.]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/11/glaxosmithkline-reportedly-thr.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/11/glaxosmithkline-reportedly-thr.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">avandia</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gsk</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vioxx</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>U.K. drug giant buys vaccine firm</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/medimmune_logo.gif" border="0" alt="medImmune" title="medImmune" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="201" height="61" align="left" /> LONDON&ndash;AstraZeneca PLC said yesterday it is buying U.S.-based biotech drug maker MedImmune Inc. in a $15.6 billion (U.S.) deal that will allow the British company to enter the vaccines market.</p><p> AstraZeneca, looking to strengthen its pipeline of future drugs as it faces patent challenges and escalating generic competition, will pay $58 per share for MedImmune, a 21 per cent premium to the stock&#39;s close Friday.</p><p> The deal, which AstraZeneca hopes to close in June, will increase the company&#39;s proportion of biotechnology drugs in its pipeline to 27 per cent from 7 per cent, and enlarge its total pipeline by 45 projects to 163 projects.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/04/uk-drug-giant-buys-vaccine-fir.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/04/uk-drug-giant-buys-vaccine-fir.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business and Finances</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">astrazeneca</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">business</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">medimmune</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccine makers</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Analysis: Senate committee approves drug safety bill, but FDA still runs on Big Pharma money</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/senate.jpg" border="0" alt="senate" title="senate" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="107" height="100" align="right" />by Mike Adams, NewsTarget.com</em></p><p>The U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee voted 15-5 to approve a bill that aims to strengthen FDA oversight of drug company advertising and post-approval follow-up studies. The bill was sponsored by Wyoming Republican Sen. Mike Enzi and Massachusetts Democrat Sen. Edward Kennedy. The primary motive for the bill is to give the FDA more power to stop a future Vioxx disaster from being repeated.<br /><br />The Bush Administration is against the bill and offered sharp objections to the bill&#39;s provisions, saying it would slow down drug approvals. Republicans also argued that the banning of drug advertisements on television was &quot;unconstitutional.&quot;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/04/analysis-senate-committee-appr.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/04/analysis-senate-committee-appr.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FDA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">senate</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Safety information about Genentech&apos;s Avastin lung cancer drug</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/avastin.jpg" border="0" alt="avastin" title="avastin" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="107" height="100" align="left" />Genentech and FDA notified healthcare professionals of important new safety information regarding tracheoesophageal (TE) fistula formation in a recent clinical study in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).</p> <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-6184078081177784"; google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.spiritindia.com/google_adsense_script.html"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60; google_ad_format = "468x60_as"; google_ad_type = "text_image"; //2007-03-05: Articles 468 middle google_ad_channel = "9751639334"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "000000"; google_color_url = "000000"; google_color_text = "000000"; //-->   This multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm phase II clinical trial study combined chemotherapy and radiation plus Avastin. <br /> <br /> There have been two confirmed serious adverse events of TE fistula (one fatal) reported in the first 29 patients enrolled in this study. A third, fatal event (upper aerodigestive tract hemorrhage and de ath of unknown cause), was also reported, in which TE fistula was suspected but not confirmed. All three events occurred during the Avastin maintenance phase of the study in the context of persistent esophagitis. Additionally, six other cases of TE fistula have also been reported in other lung and esophageal cancer studies using Avastin and chemotherapy alone or with concurrent radiation treatment.]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/04/safety-information-about-genen.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/04/safety-information-about-genen.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cancer Drugs</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">avastin</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer drugs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">chemotherapy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Disclosure Laws Do Not Fully Reveal Drug Company Payments to Physicians</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/medicine.jpg" border="0" alt="medicine" title="medicine" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="126" align="right" />NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Mar 20 - Laws that mandate disclosure of payments to physicians by pharmaceutical companies provide limited public information, according to a new report.</p> <p>At present, five states and the District of Columbia have legislation requiring payment disclosure. Among these states, Minnesota and Vermont require that the information be made available to the public.</p> <p>In the current study, reported in the March 21st issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, Dr. Joseph S. Ross, from Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, and colleagues examined the accessibility and quality of information provided by the disclosure laws in Minnesota and Vermont.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/disclosure-laws-do-not-fully-r.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/disclosure-laws-do-not-fully-r.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Drugs and Medications News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Pfizer Ordered to Withdraw Advertising</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/zyvox.jpg" border="0" alt="zyvox" title="zyvox" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="169" height="67" align="left" />LONDON, March 7, 2007-The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency  (MHRA) has requested Pfizer to withdraw an advertisement making potentially  misleading claims about Zyvox (linezolid), an antibiotic used to treat certain  types of serious infection.</p><p>The MHRA became aware of the advertisement in the British Medical Journal  (BMJ) claiming that Zyvox has superior cure rates compared to products  containing the active ingredient vancomycin. At the time, Pfizer was in  discussion with the MHRA about emerging concerns relating to the efficacy and  safety of Zyvox compared to vancomycin in a clinical trial in patients with  catheter-related infections.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/pfizer-ordered-to-withdraw-adv.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/pfizer-ordered-to-withdraw-adv.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Drugs and Medications News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">advertisment</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">linezolid</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">MHRA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">pfizer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">zyvox</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Senators promise drug importation push</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/senate.jpg" border="0" alt="senate" title="senate" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="107" height="100" align="right" />U.S. senators vowed on Wednesday to move forward with legislation to legalize  the importation of cheaper prescription drugs from certain countries, despite  resistance from regulators and drugmakers.</p> <p>One Democrat and three Republicans said their plan would provide money and  safeguards for the Food and Drug Administration to assure the imports were not  dangerous.</p> <p>&quot;I believe this legislation puts in place an effective regulatory framework  to make importation of FDA-approved drugs safe for consumers,&quot; Sen. Byron Dorgan  (news, bio, voting record), a North Dakota Democrat, said at a hearing.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/senators-promise-drug-importat.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/senators-promise-drug-importat.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Drugs and Medications News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">congress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FDA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">senate</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Study shows near-tripling of global ADHD drug use</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/ritalin.jpg" border="0" alt="ritalin" title="ritalin" hspace="4" vspace="2" align="left" />The use of drugs to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD,  has more than tripled worldwide since 1993, U.S. researchers reported on  Tuesday.</p> <p>And spending on such drugs rose nine-fold between 1993 and 2003, the team at  the University of California, Berkeley reported.</p> <p>&quot;ADHD could become the leading childhood disorder treated with medications  across the globe,&quot; Richard Scheffler, an expert in health economics and public  policy who led the study, said in a statement.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/study-shows-neartripling-of-gl.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/study-shows-neartripling-of-gl.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Drugs and Medications News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">amphetamine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ritalin</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Taking the Wraps Off Drug Safety Data From Clinical Trials</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/senate.jpg" border="0" alt="senate" title="senate" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="107" height="100" align="right" />BOSTON, MA -- March 6, 2007 -- For years,  pharmaceutical companies have sought to restrict public access to drug safety  data collected in clinical trials on the basis that it is proprietary  information, arguing that competitors could use that information in the  development of their own products. However, a number of recent cases of drugs  found to have dangerous side effects after coming to market, such as the  anti-inflammatory drug rofecoxib (Vioxx), have raised concerns about safety data  being treated as confidential.<br /><br />A new  analysis by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and  Women&#39;s Hospital of laws and regulations governing public disclosure of clinical  trial data submitted to the FDA suggests changes should be made to the way the  FDA implements its policy regarding the confidentiality of those data. Allowing  greater access to safety data would enable researchers to independently evaluate  risks, resulting in more timely risk detection. The review and commentary  appears in the current issue of Health Affairs.]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/taking-the-wraps-off-drug-safe.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/taking-the-wraps-off-drug-safe.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">clinical trials</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">congress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>European Commission to revamp drug safety monitoring system</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/eu_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="EU" title="EU" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="151" height="100" align="left" />&quot;Although the current pharmacovigilance system is good and safe, there are now more countries in the EU, and therefore there is a need for an improved system,&quot; Ton Van Lierop, a Commission spokesperson told In-PharmaTechnologist.com.<br /><br />The move comes hot on the heels of a consultation conducted by the Commission last year which found that that the current system is &quot;contradictory, confusing, unclear and complex.&quot;<br /><br />The feedback from the consultation suggested that there are complex reporting rules implemented differently by different EU member States, a lack of robust safety studies and complex decision-making at EU-level.]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/european-commission-to-revamp.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/european-commission-to-revamp.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">drugs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EU</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety project</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>For Merck, A New Worry Amid Success</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/merck_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="merck" title="merck" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="100" align="right" />Worries are emerging about the safety of new diabetes medicines Januvia and Galvus, drugs expected to be big sellers for makers Merck and Novartis. But it is unclear if the concerns are justified or just the result of a hair-trigger tendency concerning drug safety on the part of doctors and regulators.</p> <p>On Monday, Novartis  said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration wants it to run a new safety study of Galvus. Analysts say that could take another year; the pill has already been delayed for three months. </p> <p>That follows a Feb. 1 article in The New England Journal of Medicine that questioned the safety data available for these drugs. David M. Nathan, a Harvard Medical School endocrinologist, wrote that it is &quot;surprising&quot; that the FDA decided to clear Januvia at all, given the &quot;paucity of published data from long-term clinical trials on its safety and efficacy.&quot; Nathan, who is a consultant for Novartis and other drug makers but not Merck , did not return requests for comment.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/for-merck-a-new-worry-amid-suc.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/for-merck-a-new-worry-amid-suc.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business and Finances</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">drugs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">financial data</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">merck</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">novartis</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Prescription abuse to pass illicit drugs</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/drugs_bottle.jpg" border="0" alt="prescription drugs" title="prescription drugs" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="106" height="100" align="left" />Abuse of prescription drugs is about to exceed the use of illicit street narcotics worldwide, and the shift has spawned a lethal new trade in counterfeit painkillers, sedatives and other medicines potent enough to kill, a global watchdog warned Wednesday.</p> <p>Prescription drug abuse already has outstripped traditional illegal drugs such as heroin, cocaine and Ecstasy in parts of Europe, Africa and South Asia, the U.N.-affiliated International Narcotics Control Board said in its annual report for 2006.</p> <p>In the United States alone, the abuse of painkillers, stimulants, tranquilizers and other prescription medications has gone beyond &quot;practically all illicit drugs with the exception of cannabis,&quot; with users increasingly turning to them first, the Vienna-based group said.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/prescription-abuse-to-pass-ill.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/03/prescription-abuse-to-pass-ill.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">abuse</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">prescription drugs</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Former FDA Commissioners Suggest Changes For Agency</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/fda_logo2.jpg" border="0" alt="FDA" title="FDA" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="100" align="right" /> Recent problems at <a href="http://www.fda.gov/" target="_new">FDA</a> can be attributed to the lack of consistent, long-term leadership; insufficient resources; and not enough authority to address safety issues, according to four former FDA commissioners who participated Wednesday in a panel discussion at the George Washington University <a href="http://www.gwumc.edu/sphhs/" target="_new">School of Public Health and Health Services</a>, the <a href="http://www.nj.com/business/ledger/index.ssf?/base/business-5/1172123240202440.xml&amp;coll=1" target="_new">Newark <cite>Star-Ledger</cite></a> reports. </p><p>David Kessler, who served as commissioner from 1990 to 1997, criticized the pharmaceutical industry&#39;s use of mass-marketing techniques and direct-to-consumer advertising. &quot;The notion that you can come up with a new drug and millions and millions of people take it safely -- the blockbuster -- that is what got us in trouble,&quot; Kessler said.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/02/former-fda-commissioners-sugge.html</link>
            <guid>http://pharma.immunodefence.com/2007/02/former-fda-commissioners-sugge.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Risks</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FDA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">safety project</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
